点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
动车“体检师”精心守护广深港高铁列车安全******
中新社广州1月14日电 题：动车“体检师”精心守护广深港高铁列车安全
中新社记者 郭军
凌晨时分，在南方潮湿的空气中，一列“复兴号”列车缓缓驶入广州南动车运用所一二级检修库，这里专门针对动车组列车进行检查、测试、维修和养护等作业。广深港高铁福田至香港西九龙段即将恢复运营之际，记者深夜探访了这个中国华南地区最大的动车检修所。
图为1月12日晚，广东省广州市，广州南动车运用所工作人员检修广深港高铁“复兴号”列车。 中新社记者 陈骥旻 摄据介绍，广铁集团广州动车段组织动车“体检师”，为即将担当广深港高铁交路的动车组列车开展深度检查和养护，认真做好动车组性能调试、消毒等工作，为广深港高铁福田至香港西九龙段正式恢复运营做足了准备。
走进检修库，一列“复兴号”列车停在轨道上，几名工作人员正在列车两侧和车顶上进行检修作业，偌大的检修库内略显安静，偶尔听见受电弓断电时发出的噼啪声。
图为1月12日晚，广东省广州市，一列广深港高铁“复兴号”列车停靠在广州南动车运用所一二级检修库内等待检修。 中新社记者 陈骥旻 摄“这一列广深港高铁‘复兴号’列车今晚将接受一级检修，四名工作人员要花上两个半小时来完成这项工作。”广州动车段广州南动车运用所助理工程师周帅介绍说，重点是做好列车走行部、内部服务设施、车顶的检修。
不仅是细致入微，还要面面俱到。轨道之下，长长的地沟也要走一遍，工作人员手里的手电筒既有照明的作用，同时还有摄像头在上面，检查到的每一处也会有影像记录下来。
每一处检查，既靠眼力，也有科技加持。车组轮对、牵引电机、齿轮箱等部件都是检查的重点，一旦发现故障，工作人员就会及时向上级汇报，然后再由专门的工作人员过来维修。
图为1月12日晚，广东省广州市，广州南动车运用所工作人员在广深港高铁“复兴号”列车内开展检修工作。 中新社记者 陈骥旻 摄“整个转向架最重要的东西是轮对，主要检查它的踏面，看上面有没有割伤、烙伤等伤痕。”正在进行检修作业的工作人员罗前说。他又指向车体下一个类似充气轮胎的部件说道：“这是空气弹簧，属于车体与转向架之间的连接，我们检查主要是确保它没有裂纹和鼓泡，它的作用主要是调整车体的左右平衡。”
列车断电之后，记者随工作人员来到列车顶部。这里重点检查受电弓、避雷器等高压设备。
据介绍，按照检修作业标准，“复兴号”列车每行驶8000公里，便要接受一次一级检修。除了检修以外，为了即将到来的广深港高铁福田至香港西九龙段逐步恢复运营，广州南动车运用所也已经提前开展相关的试运行工作。
为了确保广深港高铁再次开行，广州动车段一共组织了6列标准组“复兴号”列车。“我们从8号就安排机械师随车开展试运行工作，持续开展了五天，每天都是保证车组正常地按照后续开行的交路行驶，空车不载客。我们能够、也有信心，在广深港再次开通时承担确保车组运行的任务。”周帅说道。
据介绍，广州动车段还专门挑选了24位素质高、形象好、业务高的随车机械师参与车组值乘作业，同时专门对他们进行了外事和应急培训，以确保车组在线上运行安全。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)